Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AMANAH RAYA CAPITAL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SITI ZAHARAH SULAIMAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. loan agreements and repayment terms overview. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. overview of loan agreements and default (Para 10) |
| 3. claims regarding the validity of loan agreements. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. construction and interpretation of the moneylenders act. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. exemption from compliance with statutory provisions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 27) |
| 6. legal effect of regulatory exemptions (Para 23 , 24 , 26) |
| 7. defendant's claims on loan disbursement issues. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. compliance with statutory requirements for statements of account. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. compliance with statutory requirements (Para 37) |
| 10. applicability of restitution under section 66. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. restitution rights if agreements found void (Para 42) |
| 12. determination of interest rates and granting judgment (Para 43 , 45) |
| 13. conclusion on claimed amounts and judgment outcome. (Para 44 , 46) |
[1] The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is for a return of monies loaned to her by the plaintiff together with late payment charges on the said sum. The plaintiff is a licensed money lending company incorporated in Malaysia.
[2] The outline f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
