SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 108

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
WORLDWIDE ROTA DIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
RONALD ONG CHEOW JOON – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Walter Pereira ,Respondent Advocate: Jason Singh

Table of Content
1. parties involved and claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. employment details and terms. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. formation and terms of contracts. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. defendant's misconduct during employment. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. consequences of actions on plaintiff. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. claims and counterclaims. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. analysis of causes of action. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
8. breach of contract principles. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
9. witness testimonies and respective evidence. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. defendant's challenges and defenses. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 48)
11. plaintiff's claims for damages. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
12. discussion on restraint of trade. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74)
13. court's decisions and conclusions. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85)
Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Introduction

[1] The plaintiff is a company incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act 1965 with its registered address in Selangor.

[2] The defendant is an individual residing at Kepong Baru, Kuala Lumpur and, at all material times, was the marketing manager of the plaintiff.

[3] In this civil suit, the plaintiff is cla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top