Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
HAMDAN JOHAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
FELCRA BHD & ORS AND ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land acquisition and compensation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiffs’ rights to land and compensation. (Para 3) |
| 3. defendants' claims regarding plaintiffs' legal standing. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's inquiry into adequacy of compensation. (Para 6) |
| 5. examination of plaintiffs' alleged interests. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. doctrine of legitimate expectation and procedural fairness. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. legal definitions regarding land ownership. (Para 11) |
| 8. distinction of case facts from precedents. (Para 12) |
| 9. repudiation of agreement by 1st defendant. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 10. plaintiffs’ acceptance of repudiation. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 11. legal principles of compensation for breach of contract. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 12. plaintiffs argue compensation was inadequate. (Para 21) |
| 13. assessment of damages related to breach. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 14. compensation for displacement and loss. (Para 25) |
[1] The plaintiffs were participants in a FELCRA agricultural project for the planting of oil palm in Johor. In 2001 the land was reacquired by the Johor State Government (the 2nd and 3rd defendants) and the plaintiffs received compensation. The plaintiffs are seeking declaratory orde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
