SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 6

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
LOW KIAN BOON & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Edmund Bon,Raymond Yap,Joanne Leong ,Respondent Advocate: Ahmad Bache

Table of Content
1. foundation of the appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. principal issues in appeal (Para 5 , 6)
3. findings of facts by court (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
4. defence assertions and counterarguments (Para 13 , 15)
5. judicial review principles (Para 16 , 18 , 20 , 25)
6. common intention in criminal liability (Para 63 , 64 , 68)
Heliliah Mohd Yusof FCJ:

[1] The appellants Low Kian Boon (or 1st appellant) and Tan Pei Yan (or 2nd appellant) appealed against the decision of the Court of Appeal (COA) rendered on 4 April 2009. The decision was the outcome of cross-appeals lodged by the PP as well as the two appellants against the decision of the High Court judge of 25 April 2006 whereby both the appellants were convicted under s 304(b) Penal Code (PC) and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of ten years to take effect from their dates of arrests.

[2] While the appellants appealed against the period of sentence of imprisonment the PP's appeal was against conviction and sentence as the charge as originally made against both the appellants was framed pursuant to s 302 PC. The High Court judge has substituted for a conviction under s 302 the conviction under s 304(b). The COA on appeal reversed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top