Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ROMI AMORA AMIR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges against the appellant for drug offenses. (Para 1) |
| 2. high court conviction and appeal outcome. (Para 2) |
| 3. details of the arrest and evidence found. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on trial judge's errors. (Para 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. issues of knowledge and possession assessment. (Para 10 , 12 , 16) |
| 6. counterarguments regarding possession and trafficking. (Para 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 7. evaluation on trafficking and lack of evidence. (Para 17 , 19) |
[1] The appellant was indicted with two charges. The first charge was for an offence of trafficking in dangerous drugs under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952 (the Act) and the second offence under s 6 of the Act of having in his possession dangerous drugs punishable under s 12(2). The charges against the appellant read as follows:
The first charge
Bahawa kamu pada 24 Julai 2005, jam lebih kurang 4.20 pagi, di hadapan Kedai Wah Seng Cold Storage, Jalan Tebrau Kim Teng Park di dalam daerah Johor Bahru, di dalam Negeri Johor Darul Ta'zim, telah didapati mengedar dadah merbahaya iaitu 466.40 gram Cannabis, dengan itu kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Merbahaya
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
