Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA, JOHOR BAHRU
ANG YEW MENG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
DR SASHIKANNAN ARUNASALAM & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. on the nature of documentary evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding the emergency medical treatment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. timeline leading to the child’s arrival at the clinic. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 4. medical opinions on the cause of death. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. determination of negligence and causation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. elements and burden of proof in negligence. (Para 26 , 27 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. existence of duty of care and proper medical standards. (Para 39 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 8. final judgment and dismissal of claims. (Para 93) |
The Documentary Evidence And Exhibits
[1] For the sake of clarity, I will first introduce the documentary evidence and exhibits tendered. The Agreed Bundle of Documents are as follows:
(1) Bundle B : documents therein agreed on authenticity and content (Part A)
(2) Bundle C : documents therein agreed on authenticity (Part B)
(3) Bundle D : documents therein to be formally proved (Part C)
(4) Exhibit P.1 : document at p 1 of Bundle D but agreed at the trial
(5) Exhibit P.1(a) : document at p 2 of Bundle D but agreed at the trial
(6) Exhibits D.1, D.2 and D.3 : documents agreed at the trial
(7) Exhibit D.4 : document agreed at the t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
