SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 2744

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
AFFIN BANK BHD – Appellant
Versus
MMJ EXCHANGE SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Mary Lim J:

[1] The 1st defendant received two banker's cheques; one dated 3 August 2007 and bearing the sum of RM144,350, the other dated 9 August 2007 bearing the sum of RM185,630. Both cheques were issued pursuant to remittance forms which contained forged signatures of the authorized signatories of a company known as Xian Jiang Trading Sdn Bhd (Xian Jiang). When the plaintiff discovered that Xian Jiang had not issued those remittance application forms, it made a police report; returned those two sums into Xian Jiang's account and, pursued the current action against the 1st defendant in order to recover the same. The plaintiff has premised its claim on several causes of action:

(i) that the 1st defendant did not receive the monies in good faith and was not a bona fides party;

(ii) that there was no consideration from the 1st defendant to the plaintiff or to Xian Jiang or to the nominees or agent of the plaintiff or Xian Jiang;

(iii) that the two payments were made pursuant to forged documents and perpetrated by fraud;

(iv) that the monies were paid under a mistake of fact; and

(v) recovery of money had and received.

Locus Standi Of The Plaintiff

[2] By way of a preliminary issue, the 1s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top