HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
MGM GRAND PARADISE SA – Appellant
Versus
NG CHEE MENG – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This was the plaintiff's application ("this application") in encl 5 for summary judgment against the defendant pursuant to O 14 of the Rules of 2012 ("Rules of ") for the sum of HKD1,964,384 plus interest and costs.
The Factual Background
[2] The plaintiff, a company incorporated under the laws of the Macau Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China ("Macau"), and the defendant, a casino patron, entered into an arrangement sometime in 2018-2019 whereby the defendant had acquired from the plaintiff, casino chips on a credit (deferred payment) basis worth HKD2 million ("the Credit Arrangement").
[3] The defendant had signed various documents, such as the Marker Signing Privileges Application/Agreement, Marker Limit Increase Request, Promissory Note, and Promissory Note Cover Letter ("the Documents") evidencing the Credit Arrangement and the credit that he purportedly took. After taking into account a credit balance of HKD35,616 in his account with the plaintiff, a sum of HKD1,964,384 was still owing under the Credit Arrangement.
[4] Despite having been issued a letter of demand by the plaintiff, the defendant failed t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.