Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA GEORGETOWN
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL FEEDLOT CORPORATION SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. definition of debacle and introduction to case (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. chronology and background of the project (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. agreements and obligations of parties (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. timeline of events and actions taken (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. investigation and findings related to the project (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. plaintiff's claims against the defendants (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. allegations of misappropriation and breach of trust (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. defendants' counterclaims and defenses (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. court's analysis on claims and defenses (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. court's conclusions and orders (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
Introduction
[1] A 'debacle' is defined in the dictionary as a complete failure: fiasco. After a full trial, this word, in my view, describes the National Feedlot Centre project (hereinafter referred to as the "said project"). The said project was established by the Government of Malaysia (hereinafter referred to as "the Plaintiff') with the appointment of the 1st Defendant i.e., the National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "NFCorp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
