COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DATO DR MAHMUD MOHD NOR & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
DR MOHD ISMAIL ABDUL HAMID – Respondent
[1] This is the Appellants' appeal against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner ("JC") dated 9 September 2020 in allowing the Respondent's Originating Summons dated 3 May 2016 ("OS"), inter alia, for the following orders:
(i) a declaration that the Preliminary Investigation Committee I ("PIC") is irregular and/or invalid in law; and
(ii) a declaration that the decision of the PIC on 28 May 2014 is null and void.
[2] Having considered the submissions of all parties, we have allowed the appeal and set aside the decision of the learned JC.
The Salient Facts
[3] The Respondent is a registered medical practitioner under the Medical Act 1971 ("Act 50").
[4] The First Appellant is the appointed Chairman of the PIC established by the Second Appellant, the Malaysian Medical Council ("MMC").
[5]Vide a letter dated 21 January 2005, a complaint was lodged with the MMC against the Respondent pertaining to the conduct and treatment a complainant had received from the Respondent ("the Complaint").
[6] The MMC had appointed the PIC, which composed of three members pursuant to reg 26, of the Medical Regulations 1974 (the "1974 Regulations"):
(i) the First Appellant;
(ii) Dr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.