HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MIRZAN MAHATHIR – Appellant
Versus
STAR PAPYRUS SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff seeks damages and particulars related to defamation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's arguments against the order for particulars. (Para 5 , 28) |
| 3. court observations on the necessity of particularisation. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 16 , 23) |
| 4. court emphasizes clarity in justification pleadings. (Para 8 , 9 , 14 , 18) |
| 5. final ruling on the dismissal of the appeal with costs. (Para 52) |
Facts
[1] The plaintiffs claim against the defendant is for damages and for an injunction restraining the defendant whether by itself, its directors, servants or otherwise howsoever from further printing, publishing or causing to be printed and published the said or similar words or matter defamatory of the plaintiff with interest and costs. The defendant is and has been at all material times the printer of the Asian Wall Street Journal (AWSJ). The said defamatory words of the plaintiff were published in the AWSJs issue of 4 January 1999. The writ and statement of claim were served on the defendant on 4 February 1999 and the defence filed on 1 March 1999. There was also a reply filed on 15 March 1999. Having filed the reply the plaintiff then took out a summons seeking
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.