HII HIONG TECK vs LEES FROZEN FOOD SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 941

INDUSTRIAL COURT IPOH
HII HIONG TECK – Appellant
Versus
LEES FROZEN FOOD SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Khoo Ai Theng ,Respondent Advocate: Amardeep Singh Toor,Wong Lien Taa

Table of Content
1. dismissal details and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. company's defense and rationale. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. claimant's arguments against dismissal. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. legal standards for dismissal. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
5. court's evaluation and findings. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89)
6. conclusion and dismissal of the claim. (Para 90 , 91)

Zulhelmy Hasan:

Reference

[1] This is a reference by the Director General of Industrial Relations Department Malaysia dated 2 March 2022 pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 which was received by the Industrial Court of Malaysia on 8 March 2022 arising out of the alleged dismissal of Hii Hiong Teck (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by Lee's Frozen Food Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on 3 June 2021.

Factual Backgrounds

[2] The Director General of I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 941

INDUSTRIAL COURT IPOHHII HIONG TECK – AppellantVersusLEES FROZEN FOOD SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (9)

INDUSTRIAL COURT IPOH
HII HIONG TECK – Appellant
Versus
LEES FROZEN FOOD SDN BHD – Respondent