INDUSTRIAL COURT IPOH
KOGILAVANI GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
ARNOLD ANDREW & CO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged dismissal details and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. company's case and arguments against the claimant. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. claimant's case and arguments for wrongful termination. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. court's analysis of the law regarding dismissals. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. issues identified by the court. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. evidence and documents referenced. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. evaluation of evidence regarding probationary status. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 8. court's finding on just cause for dismissal. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 9. final conclusions on the case. (Para 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 10. court's order dismissing the claimant's case. (Para 74) |
Reference
[1] This is a reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 dated 1 July 2020 arising out of the alleged dismissal of Kogilavani A/P Gopal (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by Arnold Andrew & Co (hereinafter
Wong Chee Hong v. Cathay Organisation Sdn Bhd
Goon Kwee Phoy v. J & P Coats (M) Bhd
Milan Auto Sdn Bhd v. Wong Seh Yen
Colgate Palmolive (M) Sdn Bhd v. Yap Kok Foong
Ireka Construction Bhd v. Chantiravathan Subramaniam James
Khaliah Abbas v. Pesaka Capital Corporation Sdn Bhd
Dorsett Regency Hotel (M) Sdn Bhd v. Andrew Jayadass James Ambroze
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.