Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
CHEN SIO MENG – Appellant
Versus
IK PLANTATION SERVICES SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference under industrial relations act (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of claimant's employment (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. preliminary issues regarding workman status (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. definitions of employment under act (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. evidence supporting claimant's employment contention (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. claimant's bank statements and phone bills (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. failure to produce evidence and adverse inference (Para 39 , 40) |
| 8. court's jurisdiction and employment contract requirements (Para 41) |
| 9. finding on claimant's employment status (Para 42) |
Reference
[1] This is a reference made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177), arising out of the dismissal of Chen Sio Meng (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by IK Plantation Services Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on 1 October 2019.
[2] The Ministerial reference in this case required the Court to hear and determine the Claimant's complaint of dismissal by the Company on 1 October 2019.
I. Procedural History
[3] The case was initially regist
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
