Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
LILY XAIVER ARIAKOSAMY – Appellant
Versus
PROMETIC TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's authority and procedure for judgment (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. employment background and termination details (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments related to redundancy and termination (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. legal framework and burden of proof in retrenchment (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. non-compliance with retrenchment notice requirements (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. employer's responsibility and employee rights (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 7. court's finding on dismissal without just cause (Para 45) |
| 8. relief and compensation awarded to claimant (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
A. Reference
[1] This is a reference from The Honourable Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the IRA 1967") in respect of the dismissal of LILY XAIVER A/P ARIAKOSAMY ("the Claimant") by PROMETRIC TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD ("the Company") on 19 August 2020.
B. Background
[2] The case was previously tried and concluded by the learned Chairman, Yang Arif Tuan Iznan Bin Ishak who had since
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
