Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
WONG YEN FENG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
GLOBAL BUILT SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs were subcontractors seeking unpaid dues. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. defendants denied liability for the claims. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court examines the legality of agreements. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 4. defendants claim illegal money lending. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. plaintiffs argue for the validity of their claim. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. court finds case merits striking out. (Para 36) |
| 7. conclusion: claim and counterclaim struck out. (Para 38) |
Preliminary
[1] By way of encl 8, the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 7th defendants seek an order to strike out the plaintiffs' Writ of Summons dated 22 October 2024 and Amended Statement of Claim dated 13 December 2024 in accordance with O 18 r 19(1)(a), (b) and/or (d) of the Rules of Court 2012 ("RC 2012").
Background Facts
[2] The plaintiffs were subcontractors to the 1st defendant, supplying painting and ceiling installation services for the 1st defendant's Genting Highlands, Pahang project.
[3] The plaintiffs claim that in 2017, the 1st defendant breached the agreement for such services after failing to pay the outstanding
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
