SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2315

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
PP – Appellant
Versus
AHMAD RIZAL UMAR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. murder charge and acquittal of the respondent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

[1] The respondent, a police inspector, was charged and tried before the Kota Kinabalu High Court with the murder of one Kartini Borhan, his intimate friend. The charge read as follows:-

"That you on the 29 th day of September 2011 between the hours of 4.00 am and 5.00 am, in the house located at Lot 7 , Phasa 5, Taman Adika, Keningau, in the District of Keningau, in the State of Sabah, did commit a murder by causing a death to one Kartini Borhan (NRIC: 840512-12- 6008) and thereby committed an offence punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code .".

[2] At the close of the prosecution's case, the respondent was acquitted and discharged by the learned trial Judge without his defence being called ("impugned order").

[3] Aggrieved by the said order of acquittal and discharged, the Public Prosecutor ("PP") has now appealed to this Court urging the reversal of the said impugned order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top