COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMED DANNY MOHAMED JEDI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of sentencing for terrorist financing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. public prosecutor appeals for enhanced sentencing. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. seriousness of terrorist offences. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. public interest and deterrence in sentencing. (Para 8) |
[1] This appeal is set in the context of the sentencing of an offender who engages in a terrorist financing offence.
[2] The charge against the respondent read as follows:-
"Bahawa kamu di antara 28 Januari 2016 hingga 5 Mac 2016 di akaun Maybank nombor 154110259028 yang beralamat di Maybank Cawangan Ayer Keroh, G-6, Lebuh Ayer Keroh, Hotel King, dalam daerah Melaka Tengah, dalam Negeri Melaka, telah dengan pengetahuan mengendalikan secara tidak langsung harta pengganas yang bernama Muhammad Wanndy bin Mohamed Jedi (No KP: 901116-04-5293), dengan cara membenarkan kemasukan wang sebanyak RM12,130 dan pengeluaran wang sebanyak RM10,000 dari akaun Maybank berkenaan bagi manfaat pengganas tersebut yang merupakan satu kesalahan di bawah s 130Q(1) Kanun Keseksaan dan boleh dihukum di bawah peruntukan yang sama.".
[3] The respondent pleaded guilty and was duly convicted under s 130Q(1) of the Penal Code . After having considered the writte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.