SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2092

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMED DANNY MOHAMED JEDI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. context of sentencing for terrorist financing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. public prosecutor appeals for enhanced sentencing. (Para 4 , 5)
3. seriousness of terrorist offences. (Para 6 , 7)
4. public interest and deterrence in sentencing. (Para 8)

[1] This appeal is set in the context of the sentencing of an offender who engages in a terrorist financing offence.

[2] The charge against the respondent read as follows:-

"Bahawa kamu di antara 28 Januari 2016 hingga 5 Mac 2016 di akaun Maybank nombor 154110259028 yang beralamat di Maybank Cawangan Ayer Keroh, G-6, Lebuh Ayer Keroh, Hotel King, dalam daerah Melaka Tengah, dalam Negeri Melaka, telah dengan pengetahuan mengendalikan secara tidak langsung harta pengganas yang bernama Muhammad Wanndy bin Mohamed Jedi (No KP: 901116-04-5293), dengan cara membenarkan kemasukan wang sebanyak RM12,130 dan pengeluaran wang sebanyak RM10,000 dari akaun Maybank berkenaan bagi manfaat pengganas tersebut yang merupakan satu kesalahan di bawah s 130Q(1) Kanun Keseksaan dan boleh dihukum di bawah peruntukan yang sama.".

[3] The respondent pleaded guilty and was duly convicted under s 130Q(1) of the Penal Code . After having considered the writte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top