COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TEKUN NASIONAL – Appellant
Versus
PLENITUDE DRIVE (M) SDN BHD AND OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeal and context of the contract. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. establishes the claims and findings regarding the breach of contract. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
[1] There are three appeals before us. The first appeal is filed by the appellant/defendant in respect of the judgment entered by the High Court for the plaintiff in the amount of RM612,000.00; the second appeal by the appellant/defendant relates to the finding of the High Court on liability with damages to be assessed and the third appeal is filed by the appellant/plaintiff against part of the order of the High Court in dismissing part of the plaintiff's claim.
[2] For ease of reference, in this judgment, parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.
Background
[3] The defendant, Tabung Ekonomi Kumpulan Usaha Niaga (Tekun) Nasional, is an agency under the Ministry of Agriculture & Agro-based Industry ("the Ministry"). It approves and disburses loan and collects repayment of these loans. At the material time, the defendant had approximately 300,000 borrowers.
[4] The collection of monies from borrowers had been done manually. The defendant's officers physically collect loan repayments f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.