COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ENCONY DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ROBERT GEOFFREY GOOCH & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court decision on termination validity of spa. (Para 1 , 31 , 34) |
| 2. circumstantial background before spa execution. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. validity and basis for collateral contract arguments. (Para 30 , 40 , 48) |
| 4. legal responsibility to adhere to contract terms. (Para 52 , 54 , 56) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned judge of the High Court of Malaya in Penang, allowing the respondents' (the plaintiffs in the Court below) claim for, inter alia, a declaration that the termination of a sale and purchase agreement dated 2 September 2010 ("the SPA") between the respondents and the appellant (the defendant in the Court below) was null and void. The learned judge also allowed for damages to be assessed, on the basis that the respondents be returned to their original position prior to the termination of the SPA.
[2] For ease of reference, the respondents will be referred to as they were in the Court below, namely as the plaintiffs, and the appellant as the defendant.
[3] The sale and purchase agreement in question related to the sale by the defendant, as vendor, to the plaintiffs as purchasers, of a unit in a condomi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.