Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ENCORP ISKANDAR DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KONSORTIUM IPMINES MERZ SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and court decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's decision to allow the appeals. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. chronology of events leading to adjudication. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. issues identified for high court determination. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. jurisdictional challenges and statutory interpretation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. application of cipaa and its implications. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. interpretation of agreements and jurisdiction. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. arguments regarding applicability of cipaa. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. court's interpretation of the novation agreement. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. adjudicator's jurisdiction and decision-making. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. arguments regarding quantum meruit application. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 12. corrections made by the adjudicator and natural justice. (Para 69 , 70 , 71) |
| 13. reviewability of adjudication decisions. (Para 72 , 73) |
| 14. stay of enforcement and its implications. (Para 74 , 75) |
Introduction
[1] There are 2 Appeals filed herein, both by the Appellant, Encorp Iskandar Development Sdn Bhd The Respondent in both the appeals is Konsortium Ipmines Merz Sdn Bhd Bo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
