SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 625

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
MAIDIN IBNUHASHIM – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Zulkpli Abdullah ,Respondent Advocate: Tan Hock Tho

JUDGMENT

Choo Kah Sing JCA:

Introduction

[1] The respondent (accused) was initially charged for the offence of murder under s 302 of the Penal Code . The learned High Court Judge, after having found a prima facie case has been made out at the close of the prosecution case, called upon the respondent to enter his defence. The learned High Court Judge, after having heard the defence case, reduced the charge of murder (s 302) to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under s 304(a) of the and convicted the respondent on the reduced charge. The respondent was sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment effective from the date of arrest which was on 16 August 2018.

[2] Dissatisfied with the decision of the learned High Court Judge in reducing the charge from s 302 to s 304(a) of the Penal Code and the conviction of the reduced charge, the Public Prosecutor (hereafter "PP") filed this appeal.

[3] On 14 May 2024, this Court, after having heard the oral submissions and after having read the written submissions of the respective counsels, in a unanimous decision, decided to affirm the learned High Court Judge's decision. The reasons for the decision are set down below.

The Salient Facts

[4] The


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top