SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 1636

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
BATO BAGI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN NEGERI SARAWAK & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Sulaiman Abdullah,Baru Bian ,Respondent Advocate: JC Fong,Marjanah Adenan

[1] I have had the privilege of reading the judgments of my learned brothers Richard Malanjum CJSS and Raus Sharif FCJ. I shall not be repeating the facts and issues discussed by them in their respective judgments. I however like to add my opinion and express my decision in this appeal. Detailed facts can be found in their judgments as well as reported judgments in the Court of Appeal, Bato Bagi & Ors v. Government of the State of Sarawak, 2011 MarsdenLR 4760 , Jalang Paran & Anor v. Government Of The State Of Sarawak & Anor, 2010 MarsdenLR 3605 and in the High Court [2008] 2 MLRH 160, [2008] 6 CLJ 867 (for Bato Bagi) and [2007] 1 MLJ 412 (for Jalang). For my judgment, I am only reciting facts material to my grounds.

[2] Bato Bagi and six other plaintiffs in the Appeal No 01-4-2011(Q) are natives of Sarawak enjoying native customary rights over the lands which were needed for the Bakun dam. Their rights were extinguished by the State Government of Sarawak ("the government").

[3] Jalang anak Paran and Kampung anak Ameh in the Appeal No 01-5-2011(Q) are also natives enjoying customary rights over another land which was required for Pulpwood Mill. Their native customary rights over the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top