COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TAN SRI G DARSHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
TETUAN AZAM LIM & PANG – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of the appellant's motion (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. errors claimed by the appellant in trial court decision (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. sequence of appeals to be considered (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. grounds for setting aside the ex parte order (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal safeguards in committal proceedings (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. misleading the court on the leave for committal (Para 16 , 17) |
[1] The appellant Tan Sri Darshan Singh appealed to this court against the decision of the High court on 10 February 2012 where that court:
(a) Dismissed the appellant's Notice of Motion under O 52 r 3(1) of the Rules of the High court 1980 at encl 70 to commit the respondent/ garnishee (hereinafter the garnishee) for contempt of court; and
(b) Allowed the garnishee's application at encl 73 to set aside the ex parte order at encl 69 pursuant to O 52 r 2(2) made on 23 November 2011 granting leave to commence committal proceedings.
The Memorandum Of Appeal
[2] In his Memorandum of Appeal, the appellant asserted that the learned judge erred in law and in fact as follows:
(a) In setting aside encl 69 which is the ex parte application of the appellant for leave to commit the respondent.
(b) In ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.