FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
SCORE OPTIONS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MEXALAND DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against court of appeal decision. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. overview of the facts surrounding the land and agreements. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. outline of proceedings in the high court. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court of appeal's observations on caveatable interest. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal criteria defining caveatable interest. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. function of a caveat (Para 26 , 28) |
| 7. caveatable interests must be registrable (Para 32) |
| 8. present vs potential interest (Para 39 , 42) |
[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 19 May 2010 allowing the respondent's appeal. This Court had on 22 August 2011 granted the appellant leave to appeal to this Court on the following questions of law:
"(i) With reference to s 326(2) of the National Land Code, what are the requirements to be satisfied by a caveator before the Court may allow an extension of a private caveat on an ex parte basis?
(ii) Whether a party to a joint venture agreement to develop land for profit has a caveatable interest in the land?
(iii) Whether a private caveat lodged over the whole of a land can be p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.