Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DATUK M KAYVEAS – Appellant
Versus
SEE HONG CHEN & SONS SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trust created through share transfer. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. jurisdiction and procedural questions of law. (Para 3) |
| 3. details on property possession and infringement. (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. facts surrounding the property acquisition and trust creation. (Para 7) |
| 5. contingent claims against defendants regarding trust breach. (Para 11) |
| 6. court's findings and acceptance of trust principles. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. doctrine of constructive trust applied. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 8. court of appeal's misinterpretation of trust. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 25) |
| 9. trust existence and evidentiary considerations. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. categories of trusts, express versus constructive trusts. (Para 32 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. constructive trust principles and implications. (Para 33 , 34 , 43) |
| 12. bona fide purchaser considerations. (Para 42 , 44) |
| 13. final orders and conclusions of the court. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
[1] For ease of reference, the plaintiff who is intituled in the statement of claim as Datuk M Kayveas though on a representative capacity shall be referred to as the appellant. Parties agree that the actual appellant is a political party,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
