Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PUNCAK NIAGA (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
NZ WHEELS SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. sequence of defects with the vehicle (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. overview of summary judgment standards (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. defendant's explanation regarding vehicle issues (Para 24 , 25) |
| 5. statutory implied guarantees of acceptable quality (Para 26 , 27) |
| 6. legal basis for rejection of goods (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. judicial precedents on consumer expectation (Para 30 , 31) |
| 8. consumption rights under various scenarios (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. judgment on the plaintiff's entitlement and defects acknowledgment. (Para 37 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. documentation evidence supporting plaintiff's claim (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. conclusion on defects and contractual obligations (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. court's acceptance of evidence and judicial reasoning (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 13. final decision and order by the court (Para 55) |
| 14. conclusion and judgment order in favor of the plaintiff. (Para 56) |
[1] The plaintiff appellant (Puncak Niaga (M) Sdn Bhd) applied for summary judgment under Order 14 of the Rules of the High 1980 ("RHC") against the first defendant respondent (NZ Wheels Sdn Bhd (no
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
