COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LAMA TILE (TIMUR) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
LIM MENG KWANG & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on fraudulent trading claim (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 2. court's analysis of evidence and findings (Para 3 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 27) |
| 3. appellant's arguments against high court findings (Para 14 , 21) |
| 4. arguments presented by the appellant during the appeal. (Para 20) |
| 5. ratio decidendi on s 304 application requirements (Para 22 , 25 , 26) |
[1] In this appeal, the appellant was the plaintiff in the High Court. The appellant filed a writ action against the respondents, as defendants, seeking remedies under s 304(1) of the Companies Act 1965 ("the Act"). The High Court dismissed the claim.
[2] The respondents were common Directors and shareholders of two companies, namely, LMK Edaran Sdn Bhd and SLMK Edaran Sdn Bhd (hereafter, "LMK Edaran" and "SLMK Edaran"). In essence, the claim was grounded on fraudulent trading by LMK Edaran and its Directors/shareholders (the respondents), by which the plaintiff, as the creditor of LMK Edaran, was defrauded in the sense that, after judgment had been obtained against LMK Edaran, the business of LMK Edaran was transferred to SMLK Edaran, leaving SMK Edaran dormant so as to defeat the rights of the appellant as th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.