SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1150

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PRASIT PUNYANG – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of drugs trafficking case. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. conclusion of appeal and acquittal. (Para 2)
3. contention on failure to consider defence. (Para 7 , 12)
4. court's analysis on burden of proof and cautioned statement. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15)
Azahar Mohamed JCA:

[1] Prasit Punyang ("the appellant"), was charged and tried in the High Court at Kangar for trafficking in dangerous drugs, namely 937.5 grams of cannabis, an offence under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("DDA"), and punishable under s 39B(2) of the . The offence was said to have been committed on 19 May 2010 at about 6.30pm in a boat at Pelantar Ikan Kampung Tandiap, Kuala Perlis, in the District of Kangar, in the State of Perlis.

[2] The learned Judicial Commissioner ("JC") at the conclusion of the trial convicted the appellant and sentenced him to the mandatory death penalty prescribed by the DDA. The appellant then appealed to this Court. We heard his appeal, wherein at its conclusion we unanimously allowed it. We now give the reasons of our decision.

[3] The facts of the case, which the learned JC held made out a prima facie case against the appellant, have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top