[1] This is an appeal by the defendant/appellant against the learned judge's order dated 10 March 2005. That order restrained the defendant from enforcing the securities pledged by the plaintiffs to the defendant, but was silent as to whether the injunction was interlocutory or permanent.

[2] The pertinent background facts were as follows. The defendant was a bank. The 1^st plaintiff was a customer of the defendant. The 2^nd plaintiff was the guarantor of the account of the 1^st plaintiff. The bank and customer relationship commenced in 1996, with the acceptance by the 1^st plaintiff of a credit facility of RM5 million from the defendant. That credit facility was later increased with the attendant provision of additional securities, which were (i) the guarantee of the 2^nd plaintiff d