SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 1569

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KRAAS SOLUTIONS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KONSESI KOTA PERMATAMAS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vishnukumar R Visvanathan,Caroline Mary George ,Respondent Advocate: Jasvinjit Singh

[1] This in an appeal by the defendant (or "appellant") against the decision of the High Court given on 17 May 2017, after a full trial, which allowed the claim of the plaintiff (or "respondent") and dismissed the counterclaim of the appellant with costs of RM38,000.00.

Salient Facts

[2] The salient facts as set out by the learned High Court Judge ("judge") can be summed up as follows:

[3] Pursuant to a Concession Agreement dated 21 February 2013 entered into between the plaintiff of the one part and the Government of Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Mara ("UiTM") of the other part ("the Concession Agreement") (AR Pt A and B Vol 1 at Pt C pp 259- 269), the plaintiff was granted a concession for a period of 23 years (including the construction period) to carry out the design, development, construction and maintenance of the facilities and infrastructure (as defined therein) and carry out the asset management services (as defined therein).

[4] The aforesaid facilities and infrastructure refer to a university campus for use by UiTM in Rembau, Negeri Sembilan, on a parcel of land then held under Geran 74041, Lot 472, Mukim Kundor, District of Rembau, State of Negeri Sembilan measuring app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top