SUHAIRI ABU KASSIM vs MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 682

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SUHAIRI ABU KASSIM – Appellant
Versus
MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Ahmad Zaharil Muhaiyar,Nurfadhilah Zahari ,Respondent Advocate: Mohammad Sallehuddin Md Ali,Liyana Muhammad Fuad

Table of Content
1. application for judicial review based on procedural grounds. (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. failure to comply with military guidelines constitutes grounds for judicial review. (Para 21 , 53)
3. court must ascertain compliance with regulations before confirming disciplinary actions. (Para 22 , 34 , 78)
4. decision to allow the judicial review based on established failures by the respondents. (Para 80 , 81)

Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid J:

Introduction

[1] The Applicant filed an application for judicial review (encl 7) under O 53 of the Rules of 2012 (ROC) to quash the Respondents' decisions relating to the summary trial, review of the summary findings and the Applicant's discharge from service.

[2] Essentially, the Applicant was granted leave to apply for judicial review against the Respondents to seek the following reliefs:

2.1 Suatu perintah deklarasi untuk mengenepikan dan membatalkan keputusan yang diberikan oleh Responden Kedua bertarikh 25 September 2020 yang mendapati Pemohon bersalah bagi kesalahan tidak mematuhi perintah tetap pasukan yang bertentangan dengan s 51 Akta Angkatan Tentera 1972 (Akta 77) dan seterusnya dijatuhkan hukuman denda 14 hari gaji dan setelah itu diberhentika

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 682

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPURSUHAIRI ABU KASSIM – AppellantVersusMAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SUHAIRI ABU KASSIM – Appellant
Versus
MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent