Back
INDUSTRIAL COURT PENANG
NITIYAWATHY RAMACHANDRAM – Appellant
Versus
IJ PHARMACY (S2) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court addresses the procedural and documentary basis for the claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of employment and contract terms significant to the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. claimant presents the core allegations regarding dismissal. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. the court's duty in adjudicating dismissal cases established. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. evaluation of the claimant's allegations of dismissal. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. findings on the conduct and justification by the employer. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. final determination on the claim's merit. (Para 40 , 41) |
[1] The reference from The Honourable Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia pursuant to s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (hereinafter referred to as "the IRA ") in this case requires this Court to hear and determine the complaint made by Nitiyawathy a/p Ramachandram (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") with regard to her dismissal by IJ Pharmacy (S2) Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") effective 13 September 2020.
[2] This Court has considered the following cause papers and documents in handing down this Award, namely:
(a) the Claimant's St
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
