SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 1522

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SIVAPALAN GOVINDASAMY – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITI MALAYA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Shireen Selvaratnam,Lim Wei Jiet ,Respondent Advocate: Porres Royan,Edwin Tan

JUDGMENT

Badariah Sahamid JCA (Majority):

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Kuala Lumpur dated 14 May 2018, which dismissed the Applicants application for judicial review with costs.

[2] My learned brother Ahmadi, JCA and myself affirmed the decision of the learned High Court Judge and dismissed the appeal with costs, while my learned sister, Mary Lim Thiam Suan, JCA held a dissenting view.

Judicial Review Application

[3] The application for judicial review had sought primarily for the following relief:

(a) certiorari to quash the conditions imposed by the Respondent in its decision contained in its letter dated 2 May 2017 where, having agreed to confer on the Applicant the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (PhD) it required the Applicant to submit his final thesis with a publication date in 2017;

(b) certiorari to quash the decision made by the Respondent contained in its letter dated 23 June 2017 for failing the Applicant (gagal keluar) in the degree of Doctor of Philosophy merely on the basis that the Applicant failed to submit his thesis with a publication date in 2017;

(c) a declaration that it was neither reasonable, rational nor proportionate


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top