MOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS vs LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 MarsdenLR 1626

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Rajashree Suppiah,Amira Nur Nadia Azhar ,Respondent Advocate: Afifi Ahmad,Adilah Abdul Wahid,Anis Dayana Mat Daud

Table of Content
1. court of appeal upheld summary judgment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. applicants raised questions of law for appeal. (Para 3 , 4 , 12)
3. respondent's claim against directors for unpaid epf. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. statutory conditions for leave to appeal outlined. (Para 13 , 14)
5. interpretation of s 46 of epf act questioned. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
6. applicants argued selective prosecution and interpretation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
7. respondent defended validity of claims under epf act. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
8. non obstante clause and purposive interpretation discussed. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
9. court observed consistency in interpretations of s 46. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
10. court disagreed with applicants' interpretation of ong kim chuan. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
11. court affirmed enforceability of s 46 in claims. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
12. application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)

Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim PCA:

Introduction

[1] The Applicants sought leave to appeal under s 96(a) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 ("CJA") against the decision of the Court of Appeal which ruled, that following Ong Kim Chuan & Anor v. Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpana

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2025 MarsdenLR 1626

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYAMOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS – AppellantVersusLEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Respondent