OXBRIDGE HEIGHT SDN BHD vs ABDUL RAZAK MOHD YUSOF & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 MarsdenLR 926

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
OXBRIDGE HEIGHT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL RAZAK MOHD YUSOF & ANOR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:B Thangaraj,Tan Vincent,R Archana ,Respondent Advocate: K Bharathi

Table of Content
1. appellant's claim and background facts (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. background facts of the housing project and parties involved (Para 7)
3. details of the settlement agreement (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13)
4. details of the settlement agreement and execution (Para 11)
5. claims and arguments presented by the appellant (Para 14 , 17)
6. pleading the claim in high court (Para 15 , 16 , 18)
7. high court findings on deceit and settlement agreement validity (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
8. appeal court's reasoning on validity and public policy (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 30)
9. court's evaluation of appeal principles and legal standards (Para 27)
10. discussion on statutory limits of waiving lad (Para 28 , 29)
11. conclusion and awarded damages (Para 31 , 32 , 33)

Mohamad Ariff Md Yusof JCA:

A. The Parties

[1] The appellant in this appeal, Oxbridge Height Sdn Bhd, was a housing developer for a project described as Jaya Putra Perdana which comprised part of a larger project described as Bandar Jaya Putra. The respondents were purchasers of a double-storey terrace house in Phase B of Jaya Putra Perdana. The appellant was the vendor of the property.

[2] The appellant/plaintiff had sued the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2014 MarsdenLR 926

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAOXBRIDGE HEIGHT SDN BHD – AppellantVersusABDUL RAZAK MOHD YUSOF & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
OXBRIDGE HEIGHT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL RAZAK MOHD YUSOF & ANOR – Respondent