SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 635

FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
MEGAT SHAHRIZAT MEGAT SHAHRUR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. establishing facts and context of the case. (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
2. prosecution's contention on charge. (Para 11 , 12)
3. legal differentiation between ss 299 and 300. (Para 13 , 14)
4. court's observations on evidence and burden. (Para 15 , 16)
5. final decision and affirmation of sentence. (Para 17 , 18)
Richard Malanjum CJSS:

[1] This is an appeal by the prosecution against the dismissal of its appeal by the Court of Appeal which had affirmed the decision of High Court.

[2] The respondent in this case was originally charged under s 302 of the Penal Code . At the end of the prosecution case the learned High Court trial judge ruled that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the respondent under s 302 but successfully established a prima facie case under s 304(a) of the same Code. Upon being called to enter his defence, the respondent pleaded guilty to the reduced charge and was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment from the date of his arrest.

[3] We heard this appeal on 19 April 2011 and reserved our judgment. We have considered this appeal and this is our decision.

[4] The facts have been succinctly stated by the Court of Appeal in its judgmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top