COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
THERESA TOYAT & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
KHL SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court affirming original claim in favor of plaintiff. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details about sale agreements and ncr claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. discussions around legality and enforcement. (Para 17 , 18 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. findings on anticipatory breach and obligations. (Para 39 , 45) |
[1] On 16 August 2013, the learned High Court Judge allowed the respondent/ plaintiff's claim and made the following order:
(i) That a sum of RM3,225.00 be refunded to the respondent/plaintiff by the 2nd appellant/defendant.
(ii) There be interest at 5% per annum on the above sum from 1 May 2008 till full and final settlement.
(iii) Cost of RM40,000.00 to be paid to the respondent/plaintiff.
(iv) That a sum of RM4,960,000.00 be refunded to the respondent/ plaintiff by the 1st appellant/defendant.
[2] The learned High Court Judge rejected the appellants/defendants' defence and found that the respondent/plaintiff did not commit any anticipatory breach of the two agreements for the purchase of shares belonging to the 1st and 2nd appellants/defendants in a company called Amazing Green Sdn Bhd ("the company") dated 2 April 2008 and 2 May 2008 respectively. The lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.