ABDUL MALIK ISHAK
BAHARUDDIN ALI & CO – Appellant
Versus
BPMB URUS HARTA SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of claim involving wrongful acts against plaintiff. (Para 1) |
Introduction
This was an appeal by the plaintiff in encl. 20 to the judge-in-chambers against the decision of the senior assistant registrar ("SAR") dated 9 March 2000. The appeal in encl. 20 may be divided into two parts. The first part was in regard to the decision of the SAR who had allowed with costs the second defendant's application in encl. 16 to strike out the writ of summons dated 21 October 1998 and the amended statement of claim bearing the same date (both can be seen in encl. 5) under O. 18, r. 19 (1)(a) of the Rules of the High Court, 1980 ("RHC") which states as follows:
(1) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order to be struck out or amended any pleading or the indorsement, of any writ in the action, or anything in any pleading or in the indorsement, on the ground that -
(a) it discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence, as the case may be; or
and according to O. 18, r. 19(2) of the RHC:
No evidence shall be admissible on an application under paragraph (1)(a).
That no evidence is admitted on an application to strike out under O. 18 r. 19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.