COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PHILIP UJA – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant charged with murder and found guilty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution's case outlined through witness testimonies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. evidence of items related to deceased collected. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. appellant identified as suspect and arrested. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. trial judge finds prima facie case against appellant. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. issues raised in appeal regarding trial judge's findings. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. analysis of circumstantial evidence and its implications. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 8. court's findings on discrepancies in witness testimonies. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 9. appellant's explanation and its evaluation by the court. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 10. cumulative evidence supports guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77) |
| 11. conclusion affirms conviction and sentence. (Para 79 , 80 , 81) |
Introduction
[1] The Appellant was charged under s 302 of the Penal Code for the murder of Nurnia Azalea Pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.