LIM CHEE TAT vs MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1710

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LIM CHEE TAT – Appellant
Versus
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Jeffrey Lee,Sean Tan,Lock Jun Qi ,Respondent Advocate: Syed Fadzil Alhabshi,Noraini Yacob,Farah Diana Addrus

Table of Content
1. appellant's bankruptcy status and its implications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual background of the case and parties involved. (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 11)
3. arguments regarding the irregularity of the judgment. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. issues identified for determination by the court. (Para 12 , 14)
5. court's analysis of the arguments presented. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. determination of the judgment's regularity. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. statutory requirements for actions against bankrupts. (Para 27 , 29 , 30 , 32)
8. effect of annulment order on bankruptcy status. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
9. retrospective effect of annulment orders. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
10. court's view on the implications of annulment. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
11. consideration of delay in filing applications. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)
12. final considerations on the appellant's conduct. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59)
13. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 60 , 61 , 62)

Azimah Omar J:

A. Introduction

[1] The Appeal before us is the Appellant's complaint against the Learned Judicial Commissioner's decision on 9 March 2022 to dismiss the Appellant's Appeal (e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1710

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYALIM CHEE TAT – AppellantVersusMAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LIM CHEE TAT – Appellant
Versus
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD – Respondent