HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA TERENGGANU
BAHAROM ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
HUP LEAK ENTERPRISE SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial facts of appeal proceedings and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
In this decision the appellant and the respondent for convenience are to be referred to respectively as the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff took up a summons in the Sessions Court at Kemaman against the defendant for negligence. On 14 September 1998 the action was set down for mention to determine the date of the hearing of the suit. The plaintiff, represented by Messrs. Mahindar & Co. from Kuantan, Pahang, requested the assistance of a local counsel from Messrs. V.P. Nathan to mention the case on its behalf on that day before the Sessions Court to get the date of the hearing of the action. The solicitors for the plaintiff were subsequently informed by the solicitor who mentioned on their behalf that the hearing of the action had been fixed for 8 February 1999. However, on 8 February 1999 when the counsel for the plaintiff attended Court for the intended hearing he discovered that the action was not on the cause list for the day. Upon inquiries made with the Court registry, it was informed that the matter was actually fixed for hearing on 11 September 1998
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.