SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2404

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
VEERAN VEERIAH – Appellant
Versus
PP & ANOTHER APPEALS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RSN Rayer ,Respondent Advocate: Kwan Li Sa

Table of Content
1. introduction of the appeals and charges under s 302 of the penal code. (Para 1 , 2)
2. detailing of the events leading to the deceased's murder as witnessed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. evaluation of witness credibility and evidence presented at trial. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

[1] This appeal and Criminal Appeal No P-05(M)-186-05/2016 were heard together as they arose from the same criminal trial in the Penang High Court under Criminal Trial No 45B-33-11/2014. The appeals, therefore, were related whilst undeniably involving the same accused persons besides the same common core of facts and issues. We propose to give reasons for our decisions with respect to these appeals in one common judgment. We shall, in this judgment, refer to the appellant in this appeal as the first appellant and the appellant in appeal number 186 as the second appellant. Before proceeding further, we may necessarily mention that both appellants were convicted of an offence of murder under s 302 of the Penal Code and consequently sentenced to death by the High Court. The appeals before this Court were against the order of such conviction and sentence. We shall now set out the charge upon which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top