SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 901

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KONG HOI CHIENG – Appellant
Versus
AK LAND SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Chung Jiun Dau ,Respondent Advocate: Dayangku Afiqah Alya Engku Johari,Mohd Zulfadhli Darman Shah

JUDGMENT

Mohd Sofian Abdul Razak JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is the appellant/plaintiff's appeal against the decision of the High Court in dismissing the appellant/plaintiff's claim against the 2nd defendant with no order as to costs.

[2] For ease of reference, parties shall be referred to as they were in the proceedings before the High Court namely the appellant as plaintiff and the respondent as the defendant.

[3] Having considered the appeal records and the submissions of the parties in the appeal, it is our unanimous decision that the appeal is allowed with no order as to costs. We now give our reasons for the same.

Background Facts

[4] The plaintiff and the 1st defendant are father and son. They worked together and ran what is known today as the Konkasaki Group. The 1st defendant worked as the Office Manager and was appointed Directors in several companies in the Konkasaki Group. The 2nd defendant was also given shares in the companies in the Konkasaki Group.

[5] Due to some misunderstanding they both agreed to amicably part ways. It all started in early 2005 when the 1st defendant allegedly assaulted the plaintiff over a heated argument with his wife (the mother of the 1st defendant).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top