SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 50

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TANJUNG TERAS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:S Ramesh ,Respondent Advocate: Juraidah Abbas

Table of Content
1. opening statement on the appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background of events leading to the counterclaim. (Para 4 , 5)
3. high court's findings and conclusions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. decision including awarded compensation. (Para 13 , 14 , 29 , 65)
Lim Yee Lan JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant/defendant against the decision of the Kuala Lumpur High Court dated 28 February 2013 which dismissed the appellant/defendant's counterclaim for the sum of RM3,009,254.23 against the respondent/plaintiff.

[2] We heard the appeal on 13 August 2014, after which we adjourned the matter for consideration and decision. We now give our decision.

[3] In this judgment, the parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.

Background Facts

[4] The chronology of events leading to the counterclaim of the defendant can be summarised as follows:

(i) the plaintiff entered into a sale and purchase agreement dated 24 May 2003 ("the agreement") with a company known as Jeram Permata (Cheras Sdn Bhd) ("JP"), in which, in consideration of JP agreeing to sell a piece of land and constructing on the said land 226 medium cost apartments as staff quarters for the Jabatan Bomba Dan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top