SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1034

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YU GUI – Appellant
Versus
JEFFERY LAW SIEW SU & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant's initial challenge against the injunction and its context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legal analysis of appeal and procedural objections. (Para 4 , 5 , 9)
3. reflection on the standards of proof and evidence. (Para 13 , 19 , 20)
4. final ruling and reinstatement of the previous order. (Para 15)
Abdul Wahab Patail JCA:

[1] The 2nd defendant, Yu Gui ("the appellant") appealed against the decision made on 4 January 2013 by the Judge in Chambers to allow an appeal from the assessment by the Senior Assistant Registrar on 20 September 2012.

[2] On 20 August 2009, the High Court had set aside and dissolved ex parte orders for interim injunction granted on 29 June 2009 and ordered damages occasioned thereby be assessed by the Deputy Registrar and paid by Jeffery Law Siew Su, Ng Siew Hong and Mastika Jaya Timber Sdn Bhd, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs and the 1st, 2nd and the 3rd respondents respectively ("the respondents"), to the appellant.

[3] The respondents had obtained on 29 June 2009 by an ex parte application against Jin Chenji, Yu Gui, Lee Chien-Jung, Rich Efficient Wood Industries Sdn Bhd, PDZ Shipping Agency (Kuching) Sdn Bhd, as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top