SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 294

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
NGUMBANG ABANG & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Fairuz Johari ,Respondent Advocate: Harold Emparak Kerebo

JUDGMENT

Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali JCA:

Introduction

[1] Both respondents, Udi Anak Ambo (1st respondent/1st Accused) and Ngumbang Anak Abang (2nd respondent/2nd Accused) were charged for an offence of murder in the High Court of Sibu and the charge against them read as follows:

That you together, on 19 March 2017, between 12.20 am. and 3.30 am. at chilli farm, Ulu Sungai Enseluai Sare, 96100 Sarikei, in the District of Sarikei, in the State of Sarawak, in furtherance of the common intention of you all, did commit murder by causing the death of JAMPONG ANAK JON (NRIC: 650807-135913), and you thereby committed an offence punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code , and read together with s 34 of the same Code.

[2] At the end of the prosecution's case, the learned High Court Judge (LHCJ) made a finding that the prosecution had successfully proved a prima facie case against the respondents and called on them to enter their defence. At the end of the defence's case, the LHCJ decided that both respondents had successfully raised reasonable doubts and thus, both respondents were acquitted and discharged. Aggrieved with the said decision, the Public Prosecutor (the appellant) appealed.

[3] The ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top