COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SIME DARBY ENERGY SOLUTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
RZH SETIA JAYA SDN BHD – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant/defendant against the decision of the Learned Judicial Commissioner ("LJC") dated 4 June 2020 in granting an injunction to restrain the appellant from filing a winding-up petition against the respondent/plaintiff based on 31 December 2019 Statutory Notice.
Background Facts
[2] The respondent was the main contractor appointed by Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran Malaysia to execute construction works for a project at the Melaka River. In turn, the respondent appointed the appellant as a subcontractor to execute certain parts of the works.
[3] The appellant commenced adjudication proceedings against the respondent under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA 2012"). The appellant claims a total amount of RM3,483,025.06 comprising:
(1) Balance of certified claim Nos 1 to 16;
(2) Non-certified Progress Claims Nos 17 and 18;
(3) Revised Progress Claim No 19;
(4) Variation Order;
(5) Remeasurement works and other miscellaneous items
[4] In the adjudication, the respondent contended that although there was an unpaid certified amount of RM1,255,794.63 and variation of RM80,631.76, the claims w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.