Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TENAGA NASIONAL BHD – Appellant
Versus
UNGGUL TANGKAS SDN BHD & ANOR AND OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant initiated appeals related to land compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. high court's ruling on intervention and relevance of compensation award. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. legal standing of a paymaster in objection proceedings. (Para 8) |
| 4. tnb's arguments regarding legal standing in compensation hearings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. respondent contests tnb's application based on procedural compliance. (Para 16 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. the importance of lodging objections and its effects. (Para 26 , 32) |
| 7. court's rationale for denying tnb's right to intervene. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. delineation of intervention rights under the act. (Para 30 , 31 , 34) |
| 9. court's decision regarding intervention and its basis. (Para 39 , 41) |
[1] These are four appeals filed by the appellant, Tenaga Nasional Berhad ("TNB") before this court originating from two land reference proceedings in the High court which were heard together The respondent in these four appeals is Unggul Tangkas Sdn Bhd ("Unggul Tangkas"). Unggul Tangkas was the registered owner of two pieces of land ("scheduled land") which were acquired for TNB pursuant to s 3(1)(a) of the Land Acquisition Act 1960 ('Act'). Unggul Tangkas was aw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
