ALI TAN ABDULLAH vs PP - 2012 MarsdenLR 646

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2012 MarsdenLR 646

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ALI TAN ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellant charged with two murders. (Para 1)
2. court affirmed conviction and sentencing. (Para 2 , 19)
3. circumstantial evidence surrounding the crimes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. appellant's actions post-crime suggest guilt. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. admission of dna evidence and subsequent reconsideration. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. inadmissible dna evidence does not overturn other supporting evidence. (Para 16 , 18)
7. circumstantial evidence sufficient for conviction. (Para 17)
8. reasonable doubt not established by appellant's defense. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

[1] Ali Tan bin Abdullah, the appellant herein was charged in the High Court of Seremban for committing murder of Nor Liza bte Ishak (1st charge), punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code . He was also charged with murdering Amirul Ayman (2nd charge), the child of Nor Liza bte Ishak, at the same time and place. The charges read as follows:

1st charge

"Bahawa kamu pada tarikh 2 September 2010 jam lebih kurang 3.15 petang hingga tarikh 3 September 2010 jam lebih kurang 10.15 pagi, di rumah no B5-1-09B, Flat Win Min, Pasar Baru, di dalam Daerah Port Dickson, di dalam Negeri Sembilan, didapati dengan sengaj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2012 MarsdenLR 646

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAALI TAN ABDULLAH – AppellantVersusPP – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ALI TAN ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent